考研閱讀之推理題例題及相關(guān)講解

關(guān)鍵字考研閱讀考研閱讀研閱讀之推理題

2020-11-27 來(lái)源：新通教育網(wǎng)igo.cn 作者：閱讀量：手機(jī)閱讀

導(dǎo)讀

推理題對(duì)于大多數(shù)的考研學(xué)生來(lái)講，都是一個(gè)很難的題型。它有時(shí)候是可以定位的，但是對(duì)閱讀理解力的要求會(huì)更高，因?yàn)榇蠖鄶?shù)答案是要求有更深層的理解的，不僅僅要體會(huì)意思，而且還要有很好的排除干擾項(xiàng)的能力。

We are overloaded daily with new discoveries, patents and inventions all promising a better life, but that better life has not been forthcoming for most. Too many well-funded entrepreneurial efforts turn out to promise more than they can deliver or read as parody. When everything is characterized as “world-changing,” is anything ? The impulse to conflate those efforts with Nobel-Prize-worthy good works is not just a bit crazy, it is currently a wildfire burning through the so-called innovation sector. Products and services are designed to “disrupt” market sectors--bringing to market things no one really needs--more than to solve actual problems, especially those problems described as “the unexotic underclass”--single mothers, the white rural poor, veterans, out-of-work Americans over 50.

It is indicated in Paragraph 1 that many entrepreneurial efforts______.

A succeed in creating a better life

B effectively spur the innovation sector

C produce a disruptive influence on market

D cause more real problems for businesses

參考翻譯：我們每天都被新發(fā)現(xiàn)、專利和發(fā)明所累，這些都預(yù)示著更好的生活，但對(duì)大多數(shù)人來(lái)說(shuō)，更好的生活并沒有到來(lái)。有太多資金充足的創(chuàng)業(yè)努力最終承諾的東西超出了它們的能力，或者被解讀為拙劣的模仿。當(dāng)一切都被描述為“改變世界”時(shí)，還有什么呢?把這些努力與諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)的優(yōu)秀作品混為一談的沖動(dòng)不僅有點(diǎn)瘋狂，而且目前在所謂的創(chuàng)新領(lǐng)域就像一場(chǎng)野火在燃燒。產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)旨在“擾亂”市場(chǎng)部門——將沒有人真正需要的東西推向市場(chǎng)——而不是解決實(shí)際問(wèn)題，尤其是那些被稱為“普通的下層階級(jí)”的問(wèn)題——單身母親、農(nóng)村貧困白人、退伍軍人、50歲以上失業(yè)的美國(guó)人。

題目問(wèn)的是：很多企業(yè)家的努力 ________.

面對(duì)這道題，我們要先去定位到原文中有 entrepreneurial efforts的位置，在解讀這道題的時(shí)候，我們要把控一下作者的態(tài)度。從開始的時(shí)候，就有個(gè)but , but that better life has not been forthcoming for most. 就算后面這句沒有讀懂，我們也能發(fā)現(xiàn)前面的句子是好的，所以后面應(yīng)該是不好的內(nèi)容。那么選擇上首先可以排除 A B 。接下來(lái)就排除c D 就可以。

If the most fundamental definition of design is to solve problems, why are many people devoting so much energy to solving problems that don’t really exist? In “Design, The Invention of Desire” Jessica brings to light an amazing kernel: “hack”, a term so beloved in Silicon Valley that it is painted on the courtyard of the Facebook campus and is visible from planets flying overhead. To “hack” is to cut, to gash, to break. It proceeds form the belief that nothing worth saving, that everything needs fixing. But is that really the case? Are we fixing the right things?

It can be inferred that the effect of “hacking”in the passage is _____.

A harmful B desirable C far-reaching D questionable

版權(quán)聲明：本原創(chuàng)文章版權(quán)歸新通教育網(wǎng)所有，歡迎轉(zhuǎn)載，請(qǐng)務(wù)必保持原文完整，并注明作者和出處“新通教育網(wǎng)（bdspfw.cn）”。謝謝！

相關(guān)搜索