11月21日托�？荚嚧笞魑念A(yù)測(cè)范文

11月21日托�？荚嚧笞魑念A(yù)測(cè)范文。TOEFL，Test of English as a Foreign Language，由美國(guó)教育測(cè)驗(yàn)服務(wù)社( ETS, Educational Testing Service)在全世界舉辦，是一種針對(duì)母語(yǔ)非英語(yǔ)的人進(jìn)行的英語(yǔ)水平的考試。選擇出國(guó)留學(xué)的學(xué)生大多需要參加托�？荚嚒Ｄ敲�11月21日托�？荚嚕�你準(zhǔn)備好了么？老師為大家提供一篇11月21日托�？荚嚧笞魑念A(yù)測(cè)范文，希望對(duì)考生有所幫助。

》》托�？荚囎魑膶�(xiě)作技巧，在線(xiàn)咨詢(xún)或撥打免費(fèi)電話(huà)400-618-0272

托�？荚嚧笞魑念A(yù)測(cè)題目

In times of an economic crisis, in which area should the government reduce its spending?
1. Education 2. Health Care 3.Support for the unemployed

托�？荚嚧笞魑母叻址段模�

I think that during an economic crisis, the government should reduce its spending on health care. It’s a tough choice, but I think cutting back on health care would cause the least damage compared to the other options. Many people still have the option of receiving health care through their jobs, education and support for the unemployed would crumble without government assistance, and cutting back on health care would have the least dramatic effect at the start.

Although there is health care through the government, many people are still able to receive health care from their employer. Therefore, cutting back on health care in some areas wouldn’t cause an immediate disaster. Those who have the option to get health care at their jobs could switch and begin doing that. People in more dire situations,meanwhile, could continue to receive assistance through the government. It wouldn’t be ideal, but it would be manageable for most of the population. And it would reduce government spending, because they would be providing health care to less people than they were before.

》》想看更多干貨？在線(xiàn)咨詢(xún)專(zhuān)業(yè)老師或免費(fèi)電話(huà)詳詢(xún)400-618-0272

It would be different if the government reduced spending on education or support for the unemployed. Those are two areas that are highly regulated and funded by the government. If all public schools suddenly provided a cheaper education, all that would happen is the kids would suffer. It’s not realistic that they would all move to private schools, paying out of their own pocket. Many people can’t afford that. And government assistance is the main thing that helps the unemployed stay on their feet. The alternatives for them are terrible. They would have to beg, steal, or starve otherwise. Support from the government is absolutely vital for them.

Finally, reducing spending on health care would not have immediate, drastic effects like the other choices would. If you cut funding for schools, within weeks there would probably be more junk food in the cafeterias and fewer music classes and plans to lay-off some teachers. The orders for newer computers would be cancelled, and so on. And unemployed people would immediately go into panic mode, not knowing how they were going to pay their next bill or get enough food for the next month. But if people can either keep their government healthcare if that’s all they have or switch to their healthcare at their job, nothing is really disrupted there. Paperwork gets shuffled but the day-to-day stays the same.

That is why I think the government should reduce spending on healthcare in an economic crisis. The field is open enough that many people can still receive non-government healthcare through work, education and unemployment support are very dependent upon the government, and reduced healthcare would not have immediate negative effects.

以上是老師提供的高質(zhì)量11月21日托�？荚嚧笞魑念A(yù)測(cè)范文，看過(guò)它去考場(chǎng)，你還怕什么！

》》更多托�？荚囶A(yù)測(cè)題，詳詢(xún)400-618-0272

相關(guān)閱讀：

 如有更多問(wèn)題歡迎致電新通教育：400-618-0272，登錄