Question
Some people think that all young people should be required to stay in full-time education untill they are at least 18 years old.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer
It is generally acknowledged that many school- aged young adults miss out on full-time education. Thus some educationalists argue that students aged under 18 should receive compulsory full-time education. I agree with this statement.
There is no doubt that young adults who receive education (include schools and colleges) would benefit from this experience greatly, for they have more opportunities to improve their life prospects. If they have one or two more years of studying, they could access sufficient and effective provision and support. For example, they may learn how to put theory into practice, thus enhancing their practical work skills. As a result, it would make it easier for them to climb the career ladder in future work.
Besides, this may produce positive outcomes on society as a whole. As more young people could access provision and support in terms of education and jobs，the number of youth unemployment may be controlled and reduced. Evidences show that those who have A-levels education tend to earn more than those who drop out school earlier.
However, there are of course some potential issues. One main issue is the financial burden on families and individuals, since they have to pay more tuition fees. Another issue is that some students may become demotivated. The reason lies in the fact that they may want to pursue their dreams in other fields. However, these issues could be addressed strategically through the efforts of communities and schools.
In conclusion, I believe that anything which could enable young people to become economically and academically active and able members of society should be adopted.
