AI搜索累計(jì)解答了位高考生的升學(xué)問題

咨詢時(shí)間:8:00~24:00 400-618-8866

您的位置: 首頁> 考培資訊> SAT> 綜合> 2016年SAT作文改革后算分規(guī)則及作文樣題

2016年SAT作文改革后算分規(guī)則及作文樣題

關(guān)鍵字  2016年 SAT作文改革 SAT改革 深圳SAT培訓(xùn)
2015-02-04 來源:互聯(lián)網(wǎng) 作者: 閱讀量: 手機(jī)閱讀

導(dǎo)讀

針對2016年SAT改革,其中改革后的SAT作文,將檢測學(xué)生是否可以熟練運(yùn)用閱讀、寫作和分析能力應(yīng)對大學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)。作文部分要求學(xué)生在理解一篇高質(zhì)量文章的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用邏輯推理和來源于原文本的證據(jù),書寫一篇說服力強(qiáng)、表述及思路清晰的分析性作文?忌枰喿x一篇文章,解釋作者如何構(gòu)建議論以形成說服力,并采用來自原文的證據(jù)支持自己的解釋。針對備考新SAT作文的考生,以下兩點(diǎn)需要諸位知悉:

一、重要變革

改革后的SAT作文將在以下方面與現(xiàn)行SAT作文不同:

1. 現(xiàn)行SAT作文的考試時(shí)間是25分鐘,而改革后是50分鐘;

2. 考生不再被要求同意或反對一個(gè)話題的立場,或?qū)懗鰝(gè)人經(jīng)歷;

3. 作文不再是每個(gè)參加SAT考生的必考項(xiàng);學(xué)院和大學(xué)將決定是否要求考生提交SAT作文分?jǐn)?shù);

4. 考生SAT作文的三項(xiàng)能力得分(閱讀、分析和寫作)將會(huì)被在各自維度內(nèi)單獨(dú)計(jì)分(而非三項(xiàng)分?jǐn)?shù)加總在一起合并為一個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)),而且與考試中的其它科目分開計(jì)分。

二、算分規(guī)則

改革后的SAT作文依然會(huì)由兩位閱卷人評判。每位閱卷人將以1-4分來分別評閱考生作文中的閱讀、分析和寫作三個(gè)維度。每個(gè)維度的得分分別相加后都會(huì)在2-8分區(qū)間內(nèi)。例如,經(jīng)兩位閱卷人評閱后,一位考生的閱讀、分析和寫作三個(gè)方面的得分分別為3-2-3和3-2-3,最終將三個(gè)維度內(nèi)分?jǐn)?shù)分別相加后,考生的作文得分為6-4-6,即閱讀維度得分6分,分析維度得分4分,寫作維度得分6分。

選取官方提供的學(xué)生作文樣本供大家參考。下面的作文在一位閱卷老師審閱后,得分為3/2/3,即閱讀3分,分析2分,寫作3分。

Sample Student Essay: 3/2/3

In the article “Why literature matters” (2005) Dana Gioia expresses that American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing. Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level. He targets everyone essentially as his audience.

Gioia expresses reasoning in paragraph five when he states that the decline in reading will lead to consequences and people will have a lower set of mental skills. He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read. This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents.

Gioia also includes facts and statistics in paragraph six in order to capture the audience’s attention so they realize that the intellectual state of peoples minds is actually dropping. He states, “poor reading skills ranked second, 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension.” Gioia inserts this statistic to grab people’s attention, such as people who teach in schools so that we are sure that children have good reading comprehension at an early age.

Finally Gioia displays proper word choice throughout the text to express the fact that having good reading comprehension will broaden your vocabulary. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society.

Gioia’s goal is to reach out to his audience and to encourage them to read, and apply their intellectual abilities to their everyday life. He has a sense of hope that people will express their abilities to grow and be fruitful with their social encounters.

This paper scored a 3/2/3.

Reading—3: This response demonstrates effective comprehension of Gioia’s text. The writer provides appropriate textual evidence (paraphrases and quotations) to capture both the main ideas of the passage (American arts have changed and that many people are beginning to no longer read and intellectual abilities are decreacing) and important details (He specifically states “the ability to create artistic and emotional ability....to craft a satisfying narrative,” will disappear if people no longer read). There are no substantive errors of fact or interpretation in this essay. On the whole, the writer demonstrates a complete understanding of Gioia’s argument, especially the relationship between declining literary reading and social awareness (or social encounters). Overall, this response demonstrates proficient reading comprehension.

Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. The writer identifies some analytical elements of Gioia’s text (such as reasoning, facts, and word choice) and attempts to describe how these elements function in the passage. However, throughout the response, the writer provides only single assertions about elements of argumentation in Gioia’s text (This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents). Instances of analysis, most commonly found at the end of paragraphs, illustrate some understanding on the writer’s part of how Gioia builds his argument; however, the writer does not move beyond providing assertions into effective discussion or evaluation of how evidence, reasoning, or stylistic and persuasive elements are used to build the argument. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis.

Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates broadly effective use and control of language. Starting with an effective introductory paragraph that includes a clear central claim (Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level), the writer structures his essay clearly, if formulaically, around the three points of reasoning, evidence, and word choice. Each paragraph remains on-topic, and there is a clear progression of ideas within paragraphs and across the essay as a whole. The response maintains a formal style and objective tone while demonstrating a variety of sentence structures. Although sentence structures are occasionally awkward (Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society), language errors do not detract significantly from the quality of writing. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient writing.

希望大家能夠?qū)π耂AT的重要變化及算分規(guī)則有更清晰的了解,做出充分的備考準(zhǔn)備。關(guān)于官方樣題、范文及評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的解讀,請大家繼續(xù)關(guān)注我們的《新SAT作文改革之官方樣題解析》系列的三篇文章。 

 相關(guān)閱讀:

專題推薦:

 
新通SAT無憂學(xué)習(xí)
 
   

推薦課程

校區(qū) 課程 開班時(shí)間 咨詢
福田校區(qū) SAT特訓(xùn)班周末班 每周六
SAT2000沖2200分周末班班 隨時(shí)開班
全國獨(dú)家新浪金牌SAT名師周末班 每周六
南山校區(qū) SAT特訓(xùn)班全日制班 每周一
SAT2000沖2200分全日制班 隨時(shí)開班
全國獨(dú)家新浪金牌SAT名師全日制班 每周一

通外語深圳地址:

福田中心:福田區(qū)深南中路中核大廈4樓(地鐵站科學(xué)館A出口) 電話:0755-83985745(電子地圖

天利中心:南山區(qū)天利中央廣場A座27樓 (地鐵后海站D出口) 電話:0755-83980138(電子地圖

 

指導(dǎo)老師

岳超
姓    名:岳超
所在地點(diǎn): 廣東省深圳市深南中路中核大廈4樓
擅長課程: 雅思,托福,SAT
聯(lián)系電話:0755-83985740電子郵箱:Aprilyue@shinyway

名師簡介

★英語專業(yè)畢業(yè),獲專業(yè)八級和高級教師資格證;
★獲得雅思總分8分閱讀、聽力9分、口語7.5分;
★獲得托福111分 閱讀、聽力滿分 口語27分;
★獲得SAT閱讀滿分;
★新通國際班教學(xué)負(fù)責(zé)人,新通外語教研組培訓(xùn)師;

  • 有疑問在線咨詢老師

    咨詢時(shí)間:0:00 ~ 24:00
    非咨詢時(shí)間也可留言

  • 400-618-8866

    咨詢時(shí)間:8:00 ~ 24:00

定制備考方案
留學(xué)快讀通道

課程推薦

更多課程+

新通為您定制更適合您的學(xué)習(xí)方案

想要獲取更多考試培訓(xùn)信息,可以通過以下方式聯(lián)系到距離您最近的新通教育;

1、撥打新通教育咨詢熱線:400-618-8866;

2、點(diǎn)擊【立即咨詢】 ,我們會(huì)有課程老師為你解答考試難題;

3、完成以下表單,輕松預(yù)約,預(yù)約獲取定制學(xué)習(xí)方案的機(jī)會(huì)。

姓名
聯(lián)系電話

城市
  • 杭州
  • 北京
  • 上海
  • 廣州
  • 深圳
  • 南京
  • 武漢
  • 蘇州
  • 太原
  • 濟(jì)南
  • 合肥
  • 天津
  • 鄭州
  • 長春
  • 寧波
  • 舟山
  • 溫州
  • 成都
  • 重慶
  • 西安
  • 南昌
  • 廈門
  • 福州
學(xué)習(xí)科目
  • 雅思
  • 托福
  • SAT
  • ACT
  • GRE
  • GMAT
  • 國際高中備考班
  • A-level
  • AP
馬上預(yù)約

定制學(xué)習(xí)方案

  • 雅思
  • 托福
  • SAT
  • ACT
  • GRE
  • GMAT
  • 國際高中備考班
  • A-level
  • AP
獲取你的學(xué)習(xí)方案

*溫馨提示:新通承諾絕不泄露您的個(gè)人信息

大家都在看

更多>

近期活動(dòng)

  • 北京
  • 成都
  • 福州
  • 廣州
  • 杭州
  • 合肥
  • 濟(jì)南
  • 南昌
  • 南京
  • 寧波
  • 青島
  • 廈門
  • 上海
  • 深圳
  • 蘇州
  • 太原
  • 天津
  • 溫州
  • 武漢
  • 西安
  • 長春
  • 長沙
  • 鄭州
  • 重慶
  • 舟山