下面小編就為大家準(zhǔn)備了“托福TPO25綜合寫作真題及范文賞析”,供各位備考托福的考生們參考使用,來提高自己的托福成績!詳細(xì)咨詢歡迎來電!免費咨詢電話:400-618-0272
托福TPO25綜合寫作題目 Reading Part:
In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The archaeologist proposed that vessel were ancient electric batteries and even demonstrated that they can produce a small electric current when filled with some liquids. However, it is not likely that the vessels were actually used as electric batteries in ancient times.
First of all, if the vessels were used as batteries, they would probably have been attached to some electricity conductors such as metal wires. But there is no evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. All that has been excavated are the vessels themselves.
Second, the copper cylinders inside the jars look exactly like copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia, an ancient city located nearby. We know that the copper cylinders from Seleucia were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for generating electricity. Since the cylinders found with the jars have the same shape, it is very likely they were used for holding scrolls as well. That no scrolls were found inside the jars can be explained by the fact that the scrolls simply disintegrated over the centuries.
Finally, what could ancient people have done with the electricity that the vessels were supposed to have generated? They had no devices that replied on electricity. As batteries, the vessels would have been completely useless to them.
托福TPO25綜合寫作題目 Listening Part:
Your reading says that these vessels were not used as batteries in ancient times, but the arguments used in the reading are not convincing. The battery explanation could very well be correct.
First, about the absence of wires or other conductors, Remember, vessels were discovered by local people, not archaeologists. These people might have found other material located near the jars. But since they were not trained archaeologists, they may not have recognized the importance of that material. So materials serving as wires or conductors might have been overlooked as uninteresting or even thrown away. We’ll never know.
Second, it is true that the copper cylinders in the vessels are similar to cylinders used to hold scrolls, but that does not really prove anything. It’s possible that the copper cylinders were originally designed to preserve scrolls. And that some ancient inventor later discovered that if you use them together with iron rods and some liquid in a clay vessel, they will produce electricity. That’s how the first ancient battery could have been born. In other words, the copper cylinders could have been originally used for one purpose, but then adapted for another purpose.
Finally, there’s the question of the possible uses of the battery in the ancient world. Well, the battery could produce a mild shock or tingling sensation when someone touched it. This could very well have been interpreted as evidence of some invisible power. You can easily see how people could convince others that they had magical powers through the use of the battery. Also, the battery could have been used for healing. Modern medicine uses mild electric current to stimulate muscles and relieve aches and pains. Ancient doctors may have used the batteries for the same purpose.
托福寫作高分怎么寫?? >>戳我獲得名師1對1指導(dǎo)
也可撥打免費電話400-618-0272預(yù)約免費試聽課哦!
托福TPO25綜合寫作題目 Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture , being sure to explain how the cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
托福TPO25綜合寫作答案解析:
In the reading material, the author states that the vessels found in Iraq in 1938 were not actually used as electric batteries in ancient times. However in the listening material, the professor refutes that the F irst, according to the reading passage, the author suggests that if they were used as batteries, they would have been attached to some electricity conductors. However in the listening, the professor claims that we should remember that the discovery was made by local people along with some other materials. As they were not trained as archaeologist, they could not recognize the importance of some certain excavations. Perhaps they were overlook as something uninterested and then thrown away.
Second, the author in the reading material mentions that the vessels were likely used for holding scrolls. Unfortunately the professor argues that it could not prove anything. It is possible that the vessels may be originally designed to scrolls. However ancient inventor then discovered that if the vessels were used with iron rod and some liquid, it could generate the electricity. So the copper cylinders may be originally used for one purpose but adapted for another purpose.
Finally, the author of the reading passage asserts that the vessels would have been completely useless to ancient people as they had no devices that replied on electricity. In the contrary in obviously contradicts with the listening passage in which the professor contends that the battery could generate some mild shock and this also interprets evidence of some invisible power that how people convince others they had the magic power. Also it could be used for healing. In modern society doctors would use batteries to stimulate muscles and release pains. In ancient times people could also do that.
In conclusion, according to the listening material, the argument that the vessels could not be used as batteries is unwarranted.
【歡迎撥打免費咨詢電話:400-618-0272】
推薦閱讀:
猜你喜歡:
咨詢時間:0:00 ~ 24:00
非咨詢時間也可留言
咨詢時間:8:00 ~ 24:00
根據(jù)您提供的信息
新通留學(xué)專業(yè)顧問將為您制定專屬選校方案
請保持手機(jī)暢通,注意接聽來電
想要獲取更多考試培訓(xùn)信息,可以通過以下方式聯(lián)系到距離您最近的新通教育;
1、撥打新通教育咨詢熱線:400-618-8866;
2、點擊【立即咨詢】 ,我們會有課程老師為你解答考試難題;
3、完成以下表單,輕松預(yù)約,預(yù)約獲取定制學(xué)習(xí)方案的機(jī)會。
*溫馨提示:新通承諾絕不泄露您的個人信息
近期活動